The last decade has seen a sharp rise in patent litigation in the United States; 2015 has one of the highest patent lawsuit counts on record. In theory, this could reflect growth in commercialization of technology and innovation—lawsuits increase as more firms turn to intellectual property (IP) protection to safeguard their competitive advantages. However, the majority of recent patent litigation is driven by nonpracticing entities (NPEs), firms that generate no products but amass patent portfolios for the sake of “enforcing” IP rights. We discuss new, large-sample evidence adding to a growing literature that suggests that NPEs—in particular, large patent aggregators—on average, act as “patent trolls,” suing cash-rich firms seemingly irrespective of actual patent infringement. This has a negative impact on innovation activity at targeted firms. These results suggest a need to change U.S. IP policy, particularly to screen out trolling early in the litigation process.
top of page
hbs_patent-troll-study_sciencemag---april-28-20161705698888
.pdf
Download PDF • 204KB
Recent Posts
See AllIn a joint coalition letter, UFPR urged the Senate Judiciary Committee to not move forward with the PREVAIL Act, pointing to the many ways the proposed legislation would unreasonably impede businesses
UFPR Co-Chairs Stephanie Martz and Chris Mohr authored an op-ed in Real Clear Markets about newly proposed rules from the USPTO. Efforts that undermine our robust IPR system will make American busines
United for Patent Reform (UFPR) today issued the following statement in opposition of the recently introduced PREVAIL Act, a bill that would essentially repeal a fundamental pillar of the America Inve
bottom of page