We develop a theoretical model of, and provide the first large-sample evidence on, the behavior and impact of non-practicing entities (NPEs) in the intellectual property space. Our model shows that NPE litigation can reduce infringement and support small inventors. However, the model also shows that as NPEs become effective at bringing frivolous lawsuits, the resulting defense costs inefficiently crowd out some firms that, absent NPEs, would produce welfare-enhancing innovations without engaging in infringement. Our empirical analysis shows that on average, NPEs appear to behave as opportunistic patent trolls... We find that NPE litigation has a real negative impact on innovation at targeted firms: firms substantially reduce their innovative activity after settling with NPEs (or losing to them in court). Moreover, we neither find any markers of significant NPE pass-through to end innovators, nor of a positive impact of NPEs on innovation in the industries in which they are most prevalent.
top of page
hbs_patent-troll-study661625037
.pdf
Download PDF • 833KB
Recent Posts
See AllIn a comment letter sent to the USPTO, UFPR offers recommendations on how the agency’s work in the next four years can ensure that all Americans experience the benefits of innovation rather than feeli
UFPR Submits Comments to the USPTO on Initiatives for the Robustness and Reliability of Patent Right
United for Patent Reform submitted comments to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on the office’s initiatives to ensure the robustness and reliability of patent rights, offering str
United for Patent Reform submitted comments to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on the patent subject matter eligibility guidance. The letter addresses how the Examination Guidanc
bottom of page